Found 3 Hypotheses across 1 Pages (0.001 seconds)
  1. Areas where leaders were appointed by election from above in precolonial times are now more likely to have less deforestation than those with hereditary succession.Larcom, Shaun - Precolonial institutions and deforestation in Africa, 2016 - 2 Variables

    Controlling on a wide range of factors, this article examines the relationship between precolonial systems of leadership succession and contemporary deforestation rates. In a study of areas within the boundaries of 649 precolonial societies, the article finds that areas where local leaders were appointed by social standing were more likely to have poorer institutions governing forest management. The authors emphasize the importance of local governance over forest management and argue that precolonial institutions of leadership still have a bearing on current systems of forest management.

    Related HypothesesCite
  2. Areas where leaders were appointed by social standing in precolonial times are now more likely to have more deforestation than those with hereditary succession.Larcom, Shaun - Precolonial institutions and deforestation in Africa, 2016 - 2 Variables

    Controlling on a wide range of factors, this article examines the relationship between precolonial systems of leadership succession and contemporary deforestation rates. In a study of areas within the boundaries of 649 precolonial societies, the article finds that areas where local leaders were appointed by social standing were more likely to have poorer institutions governing forest management. The authors emphasize the importance of local governance over forest management and argue that precolonial institutions of leadership still have a bearing on current systems of forest management.

    Related HypothesesCite
  3. Areas where leaders were appointed by democratic election in precolonial times are now more likely to have more deforestation than those with hereditary succession.Larcom, Shaun - Precolonial institutions and deforestation in Africa, 2016 - 2 Variables

    Controlling on a wide range of factors, this article examines the relationship between precolonial systems of leadership succession and contemporary deforestation rates. In a study of areas within the boundaries of 649 precolonial societies, the article finds that areas where local leaders were appointed by social standing were more likely to have poorer institutions governing forest management. The authors emphasize the importance of local governance over forest management and argue that precolonial institutions of leadership still have a bearing on current systems of forest management.

    Related HypothesesCite